This was entirely predictable: the termination of temporary authorizations for persons to reside in the U.S.

DHS terminated effective April 24 the humanitarian parole of many Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans.  (Here is the formal decision, here is a new article.) The so-called CHNV program has given refuge to an estimated 532,000 persons.  The administration appears to be counting on self-deportation.

Three of the four countries are subject to U.S. sanctions and one, Venezuela, is being accused of launching a hostile incursion in to the U.S. Basically none of the affected persons can be labelled as criminals — thus el Salvador’s prisons are not a viable way for the administration to get rid of them.

Many will apply for asylum, an action the Administration may have no legal power to deny. A memorandum issued in February seeks to block this avenue. There will be a legal battle which would hold off the effective date until resolution – which could go to the Supreme Court.

These persons had they not been brought in through humanitarian parole would have crossed the Mexican border and applied for asylum.  All of them at this time have U.S. based sponsors. There is a 1.7 million case backlog of asylum cases in immigration court.

Three Republican congressmen from Miami Dade County in the first week of the new administration issued a statement which asks that these persons be protected.

 

 

The Trump Administration is enamored by detention and deportation because Trump can act like a dictator, ignoring the spirit and law of due process, imposing humiliation on persons. Detention and deportation are the Administration’s signature acts.  Here is a summary of story of Jasmine Mooney, published in the Guadian on March 19.

Jasmine Mooney, a Canadian citizen, was detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for two weeks despite having a valid work visa. Without explanation or legal recourse, she was treated as if she were a criminal, stripped of her belongings, and subjected to harsh detention conditions. She was transferred between detention centers, shackled, and placed in freezing, overcrowded cells with no access to legal assistance. Her ordeal revealed the systemic mistreatment of detainees, many of whom had no criminal records but were held in indefinite bureaucratic limbo.

Arbitrary Detention Without Explanation

Mooney was initially at an immigration office discussing her visa status when she was suddenly told to put her hands against the wall, frisked like a criminal, and detained. She was given no reason, no chance to call a lawyer, and no timeline for how long she would be held. Every time she asked for information, the response was a vague “I don’t know.”

Inhumane Conditions in Freezing Cells

For the first two days, she was locked in a tiny, freezing cement cell with bright fluorescent lights that never turned off. She and five other women were given only a thin aluminum sheet as a “blanket,” and there was no way to know the time. She distrusted the food, so she fasted, unsure of when she would be released.

Shackling and Forced Transfers Like Criminals

When Mooney and other detainees were transferred between facilities, they were shackled in chains—hands bound to their waists, feet restrained, making movement difficult. They endured a 24-hour, sleepless, grueling transport, crammed into a bus with men and women packed together. No one was told where they were going.

Degrading Medical and Hygiene Practices

Upon arriving at the San Luis Regional Detention Center, all female detainees were forced to undergo pregnancy tests while squatting over a communal toilet in a filthy cell, holding cups of urine as a nurse dropped tests into them. They were given one Styrofoam cup for water, one plastic spoon to reuse for every meal, and hand towels instead of real towels for showers. The lights were left on 24/7, ensuring sleep deprivation.

Timothy Snyder, a Yale Professor (here and here) wrote a Substack posting titled “deportation action as regime change.”   Executive action to bar entry into the country and to deport persons has a specially resonant role for aspiring autocrats in a democratic society.  I will explain.

Immigration laws, extremely complicated and hard for an outsider to penetrate, can include provisions that give the head of state extraordinary discretion to respond to national security emergencies for which the head of state has exclusive powers to declare. In the past ten days, Trump as invoked so such provisions: (1) the Alien Enemies Act (with regards to Tren de Aragua), and  (2)Section 237(a)(4)(C)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (with regard to Mahmoud Kahlil). He has also invoked (3) the Alien Registration Act (this has not burst into flames as yet).

There are several features of the first two that are attractive to the Trump Administration. First, they brush up against constitutional rights to due process – Trump is using these actions to create a constitutional confrontation that he has been seeking. These are in effect test cases for a broader assault on the judiciary seen (correctly) as protecting these rights.  Contempt of court is a deliberate feature of his challenge.

Second, deportation is in Snyder’s words great theater. “This [Tren de Aragua] deportation was planned as a political spectacle. The deportees were carefully chosen, as was the language used to describe them. The messaging was obviously coordinated in advance. And the entire humiliating procedure was carried out before cameras that were already in place. The videos that are being distributed are not some assemblage of footage caught haphazardly by cell phones. They are the result of fixed cameras, set in place in advance, with camera operators awaiting the action. The result is propaganda film worthy of the 1930s…”

The Tren de Aragua case is a very mild version of the Reichstag fire.

Third, as Presidents Obama and Biden practiced during their tenure, executive action on immigration is an especially accessible means for a president to arrogate to themselves Congressional functions.  

In summary, in these two actions in recent days, Trump has dramatically thrown down the gauntlet to the judicial independence and has further neutered Congress’ role in immigration.  Much easier to do this with immigration than with, for example, climate policy or national defence.

Response to the ICE in Colorado arrest on March 17 of Jeanette Vizguerra, a well known advocate for immigrants, unauthorized, in the U.S. for over 20 years — within 24 hours the Colorado Immigrant Rights Coalition issued a statement signed by 198 parties, including some immigrant advocates outside the state.

For the story, go to the Colorado Sun here.

San Diego Catholic Charities Mobilizing Resistance to ICE Arrests

Presentation by Appaswamy Vino Pajanor, Chief Executive Officer, Catholic Charities of San Diego, Center for Migration Studies, March 13 2025 (edited transcript).

Introduction Catholic Charities of San Diego, part of the larger Caritas network, is dedicated to humanitarian aid and social justice. Rooted in Christian teachings, the organization assists individuals regardless of their faith or background. In response to increasing immigration enforcement, Catholic Charities has taken proactive measures to support and protect migrant communities.

Background and Context

• Catholic Charities in San Diego operates within the Diocese of San Diego, covering both San Diego and Imperial counties.
• The organization responds to humanitarian needs, whether disasters, hunger, or displacement.
• In 2021, California approached Catholic Charities to assist migrants released by Border Patrol and ICE, leading to the development of large-scale relief efforts.

Formation of the Immigration Task Force

• In December 2024, Cardinal McElroy established an Immigration Task Force to guide the diocese’s response to increasing immigration challenges.
• The goals of the task force include:
  • Showing solidarity with immigrant communities.
  • Producing and distributing resources to inform and support immigrants.
  • Educating parishioners and the broader community on Catholic social teachings regarding immigration.

Strategic Response to ICE Enforcement

1. Real-Time Information Access
   • The organization created two websites: org (English) and plantheemergency.org (Spanish) to provide up-to-date information.
   • A QR code system was developed for quick access to legal rights and emergency contacts.
   • Over 100,000 resource cards were printed and distributed across parishes.
2. Education and Training for Religious Leaders
   • Workshops were organized to educate parish leaders, business managers, and school principals on legal rights and best practices.
   • Training sessions included how to handle ICE subpoenas, legal search parameters, and constitutional protections.
3. Community Outreach and Know-Your-Rights Workshops
   • Virtual and in-person “Know Your Rights” workshops were launched to educate both documented and undocumented individuals.
   • Sessions were held in safe environments such as church sanctuaries and post-mass gatherings to foster trust and comfort.
   • These initiatives reinforce the belief that churches are spaces of refuge and dignity.
4. Visible Solidarity and Support
   • Following Pope Francis’ emphasis on visible accompaniment, Catholic Charities leaders actively engage with affected communities.
   • The organization fosters reassurance that no one is alone in facing these challenges.
   • Personal testimonies highlight the ongoing risks, even for documented individuals, reinforcing the importance of the advocacy work.

Conclusion Catholic Charities of San Diego remains committed to supporting vulnerable populations amid shifting immigration policies. Through strategic planning, real-time resource distribution, community education, and advocacy, the organization stands firm in its mission to uphold human dignity, justice, and compassion.

 

Veronica Cardenas wrote in the Guardian: “[As] I saw firsthand in my 13 years as an assistant chief counsel for ICE the US immigration system was not designed to grant due process or ensure fairness; instead, it was built to prioritize deportation as a fallback when criminal prosecutions weren’t politically desirable or feasible.”

On March 13 Dr. Rasha Alawieh, who works at Brown Medicine and Rhode Island Hospital and held a H-1B visa, was barred at Boston Logan Airport from re-entering the United States. Alawieh is a citizen of Lebanon, to where she had flown from Boston a few weeks before to visit family.

The Boston Globe has covered the case and the following come largely from it.

According to the Globe, Judge Leo T. Sorokin issued an order on March 14 saying Alawieh should not be moved outside of Massachusetts without 48 hours notice. But he said that message apparently did not reach immigration officials in time, and a plane carrying Alawieh left for Paris.

Clare Saunders, one of Alaweih’s attorneys, said she went to Logan and tried repeatedly to attract the attention of federal officers. From her account, the officers pointedly refused to acknowledge her presence – much in line with Veronica Cardenas’ observation.

Today, March 17, US Customs and Border Protection told the judge that it has found on her phone photos of Hezbollah fighters and Hassan Nasrallah, secretary general of Hezbollah who was killed on Sept 27,2024 by an Isreali air strike and whose funeral she attended. Per the Globe, according to ICE,  “I have a lot of WhatsApp groups with families and friends who send them,” she replied. “I am a Shia Muslim, and he is a religious figure. He has a lot of teachings, and he is highly regarded in the Shia community. He the head of Hezbollah.” The officer asked if she knew that Hezbollah had been designated as a terrorist organization. “Yes,” she said. “I’m not much into politics. But yes.”

Boston law firm Arnold and Porter, who had initially signed on to represent Alawieh, told Judge Sorokin that they wish to remove themselves from the case.

The White House today (March 15) invoked the Alien Enemies Act, which permits the government to detain and deport persons who are participating in an invasion. The White House said that members of Tren de Aragua( TdA) are part of an Venezuelan-backed invasion: “I find and declare that TdA is perpetrating, attempting, and threatening an invasion or predatory incursion against the territory of the United States. TdA is undertaking hostile actions and conducting irregular warfare against the territory of the United States both directly and at the direction, clandestine or otherwise, of the Maduro regime in Venezuela.”

To win in court, the administration needs to show that members of Tren de Aragua are agents of the government of Venezuela, that Venezuela is waging war against the United States, and that the persons to be deported are members of Tren de Aragua. The ACLU is leading the court challenge to the order.

The order does not affect citizens or lawful permanent residents – the latter exclusion is interesting because in the Mahmoud Kahlil case, the Kahlil, is a lawful permanent resident. The internment of Japanese in World War 2, two thirds of whom were American citizens, was done using Executive Order 9066 (1942) and not the Alien Enemies Act, because the latter did not apply to citizens.

Impacted at this time are the some 300 Tren de Aragua members who have been arrested and are scheduled to be flown and put into prison in El Salvador, for which the United States will reportedly pay El Salvador $6 million for one year of detention. Apparently another 214 persons have been arrested.

The Alien Enemies Act is one of four Alien and Sedition Acts enacted in 1798 in response to threats of war and concerns about enemy sympathizers. It applies only when there is a declared war or de facto incursion of a foreign power.

Among its provisions is the following: “all natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government, being males of the age of fourteen years and upwards, who shall be within the United States and not actually naturalized, shall be liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed as alien enemies.” The Supreme Court in The Supreme Court in Ludecke v. Watkins (1948) established the power to deport without court review.

For text and background of all Aliens and Sedition Acts, go here.